eurogamer HATES shooters
sony did state that those were in-game videos at E3 05 which is why they got so much flak. And forza, fable, and halo wars were never called ingame and were always referred to as CGI... Gears, however, has never been CGI... The Mad World trailer is what the game looks like... I know, I own the game and an HDTV.
so please, try getting your facts straight
how do you know how fun motorstorm is? last i checked the game wasn't out yet...
how is it the x360's 3rd gen games?? I remember the first gen... but i must have missed the 2nd gen..
that a lot of the score they gave the ps3 comes from the fact that its a bluray player... cnet loves high tech media and a cheap bluray player would totally get them all warm and fuzzy inside ;-)
that's just my take on the review though...
its the reader score, not the reviewer score... calm down
else I'd buy it... down with EA!
both consoles are on even footing... people can debate and debate over graphics in this gen... but really the ps3 and 360 are equal on most counts and will be for quite some time (eventually the ps3 might pull ahead but there will probably be a third xbox by then)
Anywho... its the developers that make the graphics not the hardware so in the end all that really matters is what games you want/buy
EDIT: I know that the hardware techniquely renders the graphics... but... ...
if I could afford a ps3 this christmas I'd definitely pick this game up!
I loved fuzion frenzy... loved the demo... want this game now....
it is fast past... there isn't really a slow down even with the delays in firing... you don't need to stand up and get shot by using a grenade, you can blind throw it... The point is, the weapons are balanced so that its not just a race to the Hammer of Dawn, because you can still take that poor sap out if he's just standing there... but if you don't, then you're toast...
anyhow, when I started playing the multiplayer an odd sensation came to haunt me... the addictive quality o...
I picked up the game today... the single player is hardly repetitive (and they have anywhere from 6-30 enemies on the screen at once with no slow down... There are a bunch of different environments and ways to play....
The multiplayer is tight, from the tactics that are needed to getting the awesome curb stomp!! It may not be deep or have many players, but the combat is fast and furious and once I started playing I realized that I didn't want any more players... epic found the swee...
was the last time EA made an innovative game?
I hate EA
don't bash ps3 unwarranted... both systems will put out graphics at about an equal level... just bask in the glory that is GoW!
There are a lot of people who (wrongly) stick by Live and probably won't pick up a ps3 because of this (well, at least not for a year)
EA has grown more evil over the years and i'm sorry to see sony become another victim..
i'm sure the ps3 will be worth the wait... there were plenty of poor saps that waited for the xbox 360
you really make this sound like a war when its not, i'm not a lancelot.. and you translated my name wrong, it doesn't mean justice it means "Knight of judgement" and it has nothing to do with this website, its my gamertag... (justice is "jus, juris" not "judicium, judicii" in latin)
The reaction you gave shows just how low you will drop by making threats and saying that you are the only one that "speaks the truth"
If you want to ...
i work at EB games.. the game was never street dated to the 12th so it can be sold as soon as stores receive it...
i can understand the score that they give this in other areas (depth, sound.. etc..) but why only a 9/10 in graphics?? they gave ffxii a 10/10 on graphics and, while extremely impressive for a ps2 game, don't come close to the visual effects of GOW... i mean, really...
i agree except that i think netscape and AOL beat themselves... netscape was great until version 6 which sucked hard balls... and AOL has been and always will be crap.